---

Prezados alunos e alunas,

Tudo bem?

Eu sou o Professor Marcello de Oliveira Pinto. Estarei com vocês aqui nesta disciplina. Nesta apresentação, vou descrever um pouco o curso que você está iniciando e o que você lê aqui reverbera o que já comentamos em sala.

Organização

A disciplina será ministrada  de acordo com o calendário da faculdade. Ao longo dos semestres, faremos os ajustes necessários para que o curso possa se adaptar ao seu contexto.

Recursos didáticos

o material do curso está  aqui 

Está é a ementa do curso

por aqui focaremos em Discurso: Coesão e textualidade.

Avaliação

Vocês serão avaliados da seguinte forma:  Duas notas comporão sua média final (MF).

A primeira (N1) será composta pela soma das (auto)avaliações que vocês farão ao longo do curso, totalizando 10 pontos .

A segunda (N2) será composta por uma avaliação holística da sua performance em sala feita por mim, totalizando também 10 pontos.

A média final será a soma das duas notas e para aprovação imediata é preciso que essa média seja igual ou maior que 7 pontos.

Importante: somente os alunos devidamente inscritos podem participar da disciplina. Caso você não esteja inscrito, por gentileza procurar a secretaria do seu curso. O docente não inclui ou faz a inscrição do aluno na turma.

Qualquer dúvida sobre as médias para aprovação, prova final, o que é o CR, calendário acadêmico e demais regulamentos, visitem o site da UERJ

Bom trabalho!

---

Aula 1

Images 2

images 3

“This is what language does: organize the world into manageable, and in some sense artificial, units that can then be inhabited and manipulated.”
Stanley Fish

To go further: Is there a text in this class? : the authority of interpretive communities by Stanley Fish

---

Aula 2

Language Is the First Weapon Drawn” — Discourse, Relativity, and Meaning

Those above are the first lines of Arrival (2016), directed by Denis Villeneuve, a science fiction film adapted from Ted Chiang’s award-winning novella “Story of Your Life” (1998), with a screenplay by Eric Heisserer. While both works tell the same core story — a linguist recruited to communicate with extraterrestrial visitors — they emphasize different dimensions of the encounter. Chiang’s story grounds the aliens’ cognition in physics, particularly variational principles such as Fermat’s principle of least time, using language to explore determinism and free will. Villeneuve’s film shifts the emphasis toward translation, geopolitics, and the fragility of human communication.

Now take a look at The heptapods’ written language below how do you compare/ contrast it to human written language?

The Plot

What does she mean? what does Saussure, Bakhtin/Voloshinov and Foucault have to do with it? and what all of this has to do to with our course?

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as linguistic relativity, proposes that the structure of a language influences how its speakers perceive, think about, and experience the world. Named after linguists Edward Sapir and his student Benjamin Lee Whorf in the early twentieth century, the hypothesis argues that language is not merely a passive tool for expressing thoughts — it actively shapes them.

Two Versions

• Strong version — linguistic determinism: language determines thought. If a language lacks a category or structure, its speakers cannot (or can only with great difficulty) think the corresponding concept.
• Weak version — linguistic relativity: language influences thought. Grammatical and lexical patterns make certain ways of seeing the world more habitual, without imprisoning the mind.

Classic Examples

Whorf’s studies of the Hopi language led him to claim that its speakers conceptualize time differently from English speakers, since Hopi grammar does not organize time as a linear sequence of countable units. Color perception offers another frequently cited case: Russian has separate basic terms for light blue (goluboy) and dark blue (siniy), and experiments suggest Russian speakers discriminate between these shades faster than English speakers, who use a single word.

A frequently quoted passage by Whorf captures the core idea: we cut nature up and organize it into concepts “largely because we are parties to an agreement to organize it in this way — an agreement that holds throughout our speech community and is codified in the patterns of our language”.

Controversy and Relevance

The hypothesis remains debated. Critics point to universal cognitive capacities that transcend linguistic differences, arguing that thought is not hostage to grammar. Supporters, however, note growing experimental evidence that language does bias perception and memory in measurable ways. Either way, the hypothesis has driven decades of research in linguistics, anthropology, and cognitive science

In Arrival

The film adopts the strong version: when Louise Banks learns Heptapod B — a circular, non-linear written language — her brain is “rewired,” and she begins to perceive past, present, and future simultaneously. The film thus turns a contested linguistic theory into narrative form: learning a new language does not just change what Louise can say — it changes what time is for.

And to finish: Is language a weapon, a tool, or the world itself?”

to go further:

The science behind the twisting alien linguistics of Arrival

Does the Linguistic Theory at the Center of the Film ‘Arrival’ Have Any Merit?

the film:

---

Aula 3

“Memory is a strange thing..” – From Heptapod B to a Sonnet

Is the logogram below cohesive? What visual features create unity?Is it coherent to you as a human viewer? Why or why not? What does this suggest about the relationship between cohesion and coherence? What is cohesion and coherence?

“I used to think this was the beginning of your story. Memory is a strange thing. It doesn’t work like I thought it did. We are so bound by time, by its order… But now I’m not so sure I believe in beginnings and endings. There are days that define your story beyond your life… like the day they arrived.”

Tasks:

1. Reference: Circle one example of anaphoric reference (demonstrative or pronoun). What does it refer back to?
2. Lexical repetition: Underline repeated lexical items. What chain do they create?
3. Conjunction: Box the adversative conjunction. What pivot does it mark?
4. Substitution/Ellipsis: Can you find any? If not, why might this genre avoid them?

Genre: Film voiceover / interior monologue

somewhere i have never travelled, gladly beyond

E. E. Cummings 1894 –1962

somewhere i have never travelled, gladly beyond
any experience, your eyes have their silence:
in your most frail gesture are things which enclose me,
or which i cannot touch because they are too near

your slightest look easily will unclose me
though i have closed myself as fingers,
you open always petal by petal myself as Spring opens
(touching skillfully, mysteriously) her first rose

or if your wish be to close me, i and
my life will shut very beautifully, suddenly,
as when the heart of this flower imagines
the snow carefully everywhere descending;

nothing which we are to perceive in this world equals
the power of your intense fragility: whose texture
compels me with the colour of its countries,
rendering death and forever with each breathing

(i do not know what it is about you that closes
and opens; only something in me understands
the voice of your eyes is deeper than all roses)
nobody, not even the rain, has such small hands

News

Twelve alien vessels landed today at twelve global locations. Dr. Louise Banks, a linguist, stated that communication is proceeding. However, military officials remain cautious. The vessels have not responded to radio transmissions. This has increased international tension.

Genre	Dominant Cohesive Devices	Coherence Expectations
Lyric poem	Lexical repetition, parallelism, phonological patterning	High tolerance for ambiguity; coherence often deferred or symbolic
News report	Conjunction (additive, temporal), reference (pronouns, demonstratives)	Immediate, linear coherence; low ambiguity tolerance
Novel (romance)	Lexical chains, substitution, ellipsis	Progressive coherence; reader constructs timeline and causality
Academic paper	Conjunction (causal, adversative), lexical reiteration	Explicit, hierarchical coherence; logical progression
Heptapod B	Non-linear, simultaneous logograms	No sequential syntax; coherence is immediate and holistic — if accessible at all

About the end of the class discussion:

Entre-espaço: arquitetura, imagem e experiência

An atelic model for the textual limen

Trajectories of the notion of liminality: Identity, border, threshold, affectivity and spatio-temporal processes of transformation

---

Aula 4

Is it a spoiler?

Have you seen Arrival? have you enjoyed, what was your favorite….oops! stop now, do not say anything else. No spoilers in this classrrom!

What is your personal “statute of limitations” on a spoiler? How many days, weeks, or years must pass before a plot point changes from a protected secret to baseline public knowledge?

Think of the last time someone spoiled a movie or book for you. Was it an accident, or did it feel like a subtle power move? How did your relationship with that speaker affect how angry you got?

Do you ever actively look for spoilers? If yes, why? If no, what is the exact feeling you lose when a twist is revealed prematurely?

Where is the line between a teaser, a trailer, a spoiler, and a leak? What linguistic or contextual features separate these four words?

Look at the word “Spoil.” It literally means to rot, ruin, or decay (like spoiled milk). Why do you think our language uses such a visceral, organic word for a purely cognitive experience?

to ponder about:

                   THE PRAGMATIC BREAKDOWN OF A SPOILER │
                  └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                                       │
         ┌─────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────┐
         ▼                                                           ▼
[ Grice's Maxim of Quantity ]                               [ Epistemic Autonomy ]
Reveals too much information too early,                    Deprives the listener of their right
violating cooperative conversation.                        to generate original inferences.

1. Violating Grice’s Maxims

• Maxim of Quantity: A spoiler provides too much information, breaking the expectation of cooperative dialogue.
• Maxim of Manner: It disrupts the chronological order designed by the author to build suspense.

2. Epistemic Paternalism & Autonomy

Discuss the basic idea of the text The Real Spoilers Puzzle by reading its…

ABSTRACT

Spoilers consist in the revelation of major plot points of fictions prior to the time at which we’re intended to discover them. The small literature on spoilers argues that we dislike them because they have a negative effect on story enjoyment. I argue that our dislike of spoilers is wildly disproportionate to their actual effects on story enjoyment. The real puzzle of spoilers is why we dislike them, given their small and inconsistent effects on story enjoyment. I argue that the dislike of spoilers arises from a desire not to be subject to other agents in how we come to acquire certain kinds of knowledge about fictions.

Do you agree? The anger caused by a spoiler is rarely about the ruined plot; it is an issue of power dynamics. A spoiler is an act of conversational dominance where the speaker deprives the listener of their epistemic autonomy—the freedom to acquire knowledge naturally and form independent interpretations.

---

Now work in small groups to analyze how different narrative layers handle exposure. Use the structural distinctions outlined in Journal of Consumer Psychology:

• Outcome Spoilers: Revealing what happens (the ending).
• Process Spoilers: Revealing how it happens (the journey).

discuss:

• Why can we reread a complex literary masterpiece dozens of times without it being “spoiled”?
• If a text is completely ruined by knowing its ending, was it actually a good piece of literature, or just a delivery mechanism for a gimmick?

Now look

• Do you agree?

---

✍️ rewrite a classic spoiler into three distinct linguistic frameworks:

1. The Pure Plot Dump (Destructive)
2. The Thematic Scaffold (Enhances deep reading without ruining the plot)
3. The Clickbait Teaser (Manipulates anticipation)

---

food for thought

“If a summary contains the exact same plot facts as a spoiler, why does a student thank a classmate for a summary of a reading, but curse a classmate for a spoiler of a movie? Is the anger rooted in the semantic data itself, or is it entirely about the pragmatic context of delivery?”

---

Read the two texts below. Both summarize the exact same plot points of William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. However, they belong to two entirely different linguistic genres. What are the diferrences? what are the genres?

Text A

Macbeth (1606): A brave Scottish general receives a prophecy from a trio of witches that one day he will become King of Scotland. Consumed by ambition and spurred to action by his wife, Macbeth murders King Duncan and takes the Scottish throne for himself. He is then wracked with guilt and paranoia.

Text B

Macbeth (1606): Macbeth kills the king because some witches told him he would, but his guilt makes him hallucinate. In the final battle, he thinks he is invincible because of a prophecy that no man born of a woman can kill him, but Macduff reveals he was delivered via C-section right before he cuts Macbeth’s head off.

next class we will be talking about summary x spoiler! be ready!

---

Aula 5

Summaries, Spoilers, and the Ethics of Telling

Hello again! All here “tell the story.” of Arrival Which one is a summary? Which one is a spoiler? Are all summaries? Are all spoilers? Who decides?

Concepts – theory focus

Dimension	Summary	Spoiler
Content	Macrostructure (gist)	Plot-crucial revelation (often the twist/ending)
Consent	Solicited, expected	Unsolicited (or warned)
Position	Paratext: back cover, abstract, review	Leaks into conversation, social media, titles
Function	Orient, advertise, study	Disrupts suspense; reconfigures first reading
Multimodal markers	Neutral layout, “Synopsis” label	“SPOILER ALERT” banners, blurred images, click-to-reveal buttons

The Empirical Debate

Does being spoiled actually ruin enjoyment? The research is genuinely divided:

• Spoilers don’t spoil: Leavitt and Christenfeld (2011) found that readers preferred spoiled versions of ironic-twist, mystery, and literary short stories — even Agatha Christie mysteries improved when the solution was revealed first. Their explanation: spoilers increase processing fluency, making stories easier to follow and thus more pleasurable.
• Spoilers do spoil: Johnson and Rosenbaum (2015) found spoiled stories were rated less suspenseful, less fun, less moving, and less immersive — arguing the popular belief that spoilers harm enjoyment is “well-founded and not a myth”.
• It depends on mode and timing: spoilers hurt television episodes but not short stories in one 2019 study; spoilers presented before a story reduced enjoyment while mid-story spoilers had no effect; and later replications suggest the original positive effect may be an outlier.

Multimodal Analysis Workshop

work in groups

Group 1 — The Trailer (audiovisual summary)

• What does the trailer select? What does it hide?
• Note: the trailer carefully preserves the Hannah twist — a summary designed around a spoiler. Discuss editing, music, and voiceover as cohesive devices that create a “contract of not-telling.”

Group 2 — The Warning Label (metadiscourse)

• Analyze “SPOILER ALERT” as a speech act. What does it do? (It doesn’t prevent the spoiler — it transfers responsibility to the reader.)
• Compare: Wikipedia’s spoiler policy, Reddit’s spoiler tags, blurred thumbnails on YouTube.

Group 3 — The Meme (spoiler as social currency)

• Show spoiler memes (e.g., famous twist reveals). Discuss: why do people spoil? Research suggests spoilers can trigger psychological reactance — audiences resist being told what they may not know — and that spoiler avoidance functions as self-protection of anticipated emotional experience.

Group 4 — The Academic Abstract (the licensed spoiler)

Compare a film studies abstract about Arrival with the film’s synopsis. The abstract must reveal the argument — in academia, the “spoiler” is the point. What does this reveal about genre contracts?

Talking about genres, what is the genre “summary”?

What a Summary Is and How It Works

1. The Concept

Van Dijk’s foundational insight: a summary is itself a discourse, whereas a macrostructure is the abstract underlying semantic structure of the source discourse. In other words:

• The macrostructure is the text’s gist — its global meaning, built hierarchically from macropropositions.discourses+1
• The summary is the verbalization of one possible macrostructure — which is why two good summaries of the same text are never identical.

2. The Cognitive Operations: Macrorules

Kintsch and van Dijk (1978) proposed that readers reduce a text to its gist through three semantic mapping rules:

Macrorule	Operation	Example with Arrival
Deletion	Remove propositions irrelevant to interpreting the rest	Drop: the kangaroo anecdote, the whiteboard scenes, minor characters
Generalization	Replace a sequence with a superordinate proposition	“Louise writes words, points, shows objects” → “Louise teaches the aliens human language”
Construction	Replace a sequence with a proposition denoting the global event	“Shells appear, nations panic, mistranslation spreads” → “Humanity nearly goes to war over a misunderstood word”

Brown and Day (1983) expanded these into six operational rules for teaching summarization: (1) delete trivial information, (2) delete redundancy, (3) substitute lists with superordinate terms, (4) substitute action sequences with a “super-act,” (5) select a topic sentence, (6) invent a topic sentence when none exists.

3. The Structure of a Summary

A well-formed summary typically displays:

• Brevity with coverage: only macropropositions, no microstructure detail.
• Autonomy: readable without the source text.
• Fidelity: no information that contradicts or exceeds the source (unlike the spoiler, the summary respects the text’s own hierarchy of importance).
• Genre-appropriate superstructure: abstracts follow situation → problem → method → results; synopses follow setting → protagonist → inciting conflict.
• Metadiscursive framing: “The film tells…”, “The author argues…” — the summary signals its status as a report of another discourse.

Reflexive Debate

Motion: “This house believes that a spoiler is just a summary without consent.”

• Group A — Semanticists: Spoiler and summary differ in content selection (gist vs. twist). A summary of Arrival can exist without revealing Hannah; a spoiler is the revelation.
• Group B — Pragmatists: Identical sentences can be summary or spoiler depending on context, consent, and timing. “Hannah dies” is a spoiler on Twitter, a summary in a scholarly article, and — in the film itself — a flash-forward.
• Group C — Empiricists: The whole debate rests on the assumption that spoilers harm. If spoiled stories are sometimes enjoyed more, perhaps the spoiler’s crime is not informational but social: violating the ritual of first encounter.

Reflexive turn: Arrival asks whether Louise, knowing her daughter will die, is “spoiled.” Her answer — “I embrace it” — aligns strikingly with the processing-fluency findings: knowing the ending can deepen, not diminish, the experience.

Closing Synthesis

Multimodal production task (in pairs): Create two versions of the same Arrival information:

1. A back-cover synopsis (licensed summary, no twist) — text only.
2. A spoiler post for social media — must include one image, one warning device, and the revelation.

Then swap with another pair and answer: At what exact moment did the summary become a spoiler — the content, the label, the image, or the context?

Exit ticket question: “Is Arrival‘s opening scene a spoiler, a summary, or neither? Defend your answer using one academic reference.”

Extra: have you ever head of narratology? How does it connect to this course?

---

Academic References

• Leavitt, J. D., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2011). Story spoilers don’t spoil stories. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1152–1154.journals.sagepub
• Leavitt, J. D., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2013). The fluency of spoilers: Why giving away endings improves stories. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 93–104.ssol-journal
• Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2015). Spoiler alert: Consequences of narrative spoilers for dimensions of enjoyment, appreciation, and transportation. Communication Research, 42(8), 1068–1088.journals.sagepub
• Johnson, B. K., et al. (2018). (Don’t) tell me how it ends: Spoilers, enjoyment, and psychological reactance. Media Psychology.tandfonline
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold.
• Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.

Academic References on the concept of summary

• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.discourses
• van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Erlbaum.discourses
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press.discourses
• Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1–14.
• Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold.

---

Aula 6

“Guess the Genre… or Did I Just Get Catfished by a Sentence?”

To begin our class today, do the following activity

read this one sentence out loud to the person next to you —

“She left without saying goodbye, and for the first time in years, he understood exactly why.”

Now invent the most convincing possible context that would make this sentence unmistakably belong to (a) a WhatsApp breakup message, and (b) the opening line of a literary short story, or invent your own context.

Same eleven words. Completely different genres. What changed — and where, exactly, did that change happen, if not in the sentence itself?

“Is Genre a Box, or a Contract?”

We have been doing genre since Aula 3 without ever naming it directly — comparing a lyric poem to a news report, rewriting Macbeth’s death as a spoiler versus a summary, noticing that Heptapod B breaks every rule the other genres follow. Aula 6 pauses to ask the question underneath all of that: what actually is a genre, and where does it live — in the words themselves, or in the relationship between writer and reader?

Genre Transformation Exercise

Rewrite this sentence from Arrival for three genres:

“There are days that define your story beyond your life.”

1. News report (use explicit reference, temporal conjunction):

_

2. Lyric poem (use repetition, parallelism, ellipsis):

_
_

3. Novel interior monologue (use substitution, ellipsis, deictic reference):

_
_

Reflection: Which cohesive devices changed? Which stayed stable? What does this reveal about genre expectations?

Genre	Dominant Cohesive Devices	Coherence Expectations
Lyric poem	Lexical repetition, parallelism, phonological patterning	High tolerance for ambiguity; coherence often deferred or symbolic
News report	Conjunction (additive, temporal), reference (pronouns, demonstratives)	Immediate, linear coherence; low ambiguity tolerance
Novel (romance)	Lexical chains, substitution, ellipsis	Progressive coherence; reader constructs timeline and causality
Academic paper	Conjunction (causal, adversative), lexical reiteration	Explicit, hierarchical coherence; logical progression
Heptapod B	Non-linear, simultaneous logograms	No sequential syntax; coherence is immediate and holistic — if accessible at all

Do you remember when we pondered about the meaning of the sentence t from the film’s central crisis, when the heptapods finally answer the mission’s key question. The logogram they produce could be translated as “OFFER WEAPON or OFFER TOOL.”

Is this a problem of translation, of discourse, or of ideology? The same signifier, in the heptapods’ language, covers both “weapon” and “tool” — the film’s entire conflict hinges on that discursive ambiguity.

Louise confronting the heptapods: communication begins not with grammar, but with the discursive act of showing, pointing, and negotiating meaning.

What Is Discourse?

• Saussure: discourse as parole — individual acts of language use, secondary to langue.
• Bakhtin/Voloshinov: every utterance is dialogic and socially situated; meaning emerges between speakers, not inside words.
• Foucault: discourses are systems of knowledge and power that define what can be said and thought.

Note how the film’s narration itself enacts non-linear discourse: what sounds like a flashback is revealed to be a flash-forward — discourse structure mirrors linguistic theory.

Guided Analysis

Heptapod Logograms with Translations 

Key contrasts to draw out:

Dimension	Human language (in the film)	Heptapod B
Temporality	Linear, sequential	Circular, simultaneous
Writing and speech	Separate channels	No correspondence between spoken and written forms
Cognition	Cause → effect reasoning	Whole-event perception; teleological thinking (in Chiang’s story, variational physics, Fermat’s principle)
Discourse effect	Language describes reality	Language reshapes the perception of reality

Debate

Now you are going to work in three groups, each defending a position with textual evidence:

• Group A — Strong determinism: Language determines thought. Evidence: Louise’s rewired cognition; Whorf’s claim that “we cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significances as we do, largely because we are parties to an agreement… codified in the patterns of our language”.
• Group B — Weak relativism: Language only influences thought. Evidence: empirical findings, e.g., Russian speakers discriminate shades of blue faster because Russian lexicalizes two blues — influence, not imprisonment.
• Group C — Discourse as power (Foucault/Bakhtin): The film’s real conflict is not cognition but who controls interpretation. The mistranslation of “weapon/tool” nearly triggers global war — a problem of discursive framing, political context, and institutional power, not of grammar.

Debate motions:

1. “This house believes that we cannot think what our language does not allow us to say.”
2. “This house believes that the crisis in Arrival is caused by discourse, not by language.”

Closing Synthesis

Homework – write 5 lines answering: “Is language a weapon, a tool, or the world itself?” referencing to the classes here and to what we have studied up to now.

Attention: what is the genre of these lines you wrote for this homework?

Academic References

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension (pp. 181–219).

de Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. Longman.

Koch, I. V. (2009). A coesão textual. Contexto.

Fox, B. (1987). Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge University Press.

A brief reflection about the class theme can be found here

---

Aula 7

Are we alone?

Task 1 – watch without taking notes. What do you think the film is about? Who seems to be hiding something, and who wants to reveal it?

Second viewing: now take notes. Do not try to understand every word. Instead, notice what helps you connect one image, voice, sound, or sentence to the next.

Task 2 – Create a short list with three things that help the trailer make sense as one story.

prepare your answer comlpleting the sentence: “The trailer feels connected because………… across the scenes.”

Task 3 — The Missing-Information Challenge

Write three things the trailer never fully explains. For example:

Who exactly is hiding the truth?

What is the threat?

What has been discovered?

Why might disclosure frighten people?

What will happen on “Disclosure Day”?

now answer: “Even though the trailer does not tell me everything, I think …. because….. .”

Task 4 — One-Sentence post

post in the padlet, individualy:

“One thing that holds the Disclosure Day trailer together is…. ; one thing I had to imagine or infer for myself is….. .”

Task V -What Holds This Trailer Together?

work in groups. Sort out 4-6 answers and based on them complete this table:

The trailer gives us…	The viewer supplies…

The trailer gives us…	The viewer supplies…
Repeated words, images, voices, sounds, questions	Hypotheses, motives, chronology, consequences, genre expectations

The first column describes cohesive resources. The second describes the audience’s work of building coherence.

Final words and final Task – In our class today, we worked with genre analysis, diferrent types of summary writing and cohesion and coherence altogheter. Hope you have enjoyed. One last reflection (and final task):

in Arrival, Louise learns a language that changes what she can perceive. In Disclosure Day, the world must decide whether it can make sense of a truth that has been withheld. Both rely their main themes to language and the interpretation of their realities. Now I ask a more technical version of that question: what makes a text (be it a trailer, broadcast, or whatever) hang together — and how much of that work belongs to the text, and how much belongs to us?

---

Aula 8

Is this a Summary? No, It Isn’t. Or is it?— Same Truth, Different Genre

In Aula 4, we learned that a summary and a spoiler can contain the same plot facts but produce completely different reactions. In Aula 6, we pushed that insight further: genre is not simply a box holding words; it is a contract between writer, reader, purpose, and situation. In Aula 7, Disclosure Day showed us that cohesion helps a text hang together, while coherence is the meaning an audience builds from textual ties, context, and genre expectations.

Today we test all three ideas through one deceptively simple question: when is a summary just a summary — and when does it become an abstract, a review, an executive brief, a narrative recap, a thematic interpretation, or a spoiler?

Because a summary does not merely make a text shorter. It makes choices: what to retain, what to omit, what order to follow, what audience to serve, and whether to evaluate. Those choices create a genre.

As we experienced last class, a trailer is already a highly compressed form of storytelling. Every student has summarised the same source, yet no two summaries will make the same choices. This is where genre begins: not in how short a text is, but in what the writer chooses to make visible for a particular reader and purpose. Read the texts below. Are they summaries? Is so, what are they highlighting?

I – Someone steals protected data described as “secrets” and says the public deserves the truth. A Kansas City weather broadcast is interrupted when its presenter begins speaking incomprehensibly. Other voices discuss a long concealment and the possibility of disclosure.

(basic summary)

II –

(outline summary and narrative summary)

IV- The preview provides three main indications of its central conflict. First, protected data has been taken and is framed as information withheld from the public. Second, a live weather broadcast is disrupted by unfamiliar speech, linking the narrative to communication and unexplained phenomena. Third, multiple voices refer to concealment and possible disclosure, suggesting institutional conflict over access to knowledge. Taken together, these elements indicate that the narrative will investigate secrecy, communication, and competing claims about the public’s right to know.

(reseach findings)

(executive summary)

VI – The preview effectively builds suspense through its limited disclosure of information. By combining stolen data, an interrupted weather broadcast, and unfamiliar speech, it creates a strong atmosphere of uncertainty without explaining the central mystery. Its focus on secrecy and public truth makes the premise intriguing, although viewers looking for clear plot information may find the presentation deliberately vague.

(evaluative summary/review)

(thematic summary)

VIII – The preview presents a person who has taken protected data containing concealed information. During a Kansas City weather broadcast, the presenter unexpectedly begins speaking in an unfamiliar language. The scenes suggest that several people are connected to hidden knowledge and an approaching public disclosure.

(informative/descriptive summary)

(abstract)

You have probably agreed that all are summaries. And that all summaries condense a longer source, retaining its central meaning and important points. But we must bear in mind that their form changes according to context, audience, and purpose. below is a “map”that aims to illustrate such differences. Please understand it as a working toolkit, not a rigid taxonomy:

Summary genre	Main purpose	Typical content and organisation	Evaluation?	Cohesion/coherence priority
Informative / descriptive summary	Explain what a text says	Main point + key supporting information; concise, factual	No or minimal	Clear reference chains and logical sequencing
Narrative summary	Retell what happens	Plot progression, usually chronological	No	Temporal conjunctions; causal chain; controlled disclosure
Thematic summary	Explain what a text is about	Central ideas, patterns, conflicts; not necessarily plot order	Light interpretation, not a review	Lexical cohesion around key themes; conceptual coherence
Abstract	Help academic readers decide whether to read research	Purpose → method → principal findings → significance	Usually no personal judgement	Explicit move structure; highly compressed cohesion
Evaluative summary / review	Explain and assess a text	Basic content + judgement of validity, quality, usefulness, audience	Yes	Clear shift between summary and evaluation; evidence-based coherence
Executive summary	Enable time-poor decision-makers to act	Problem → key evidence/findings → implications/recommendation	Often, when a recommendation is needed	Hierarchical, front-loaded coherence; headings, key figures, action points
Research findings summary	Report a synthesis of evidence from several sources	Background → findings → implications / recommendation	May include recommendation	Source attribution and comparative lexical chains
Outline summary	Preserve the source’s skeleton	Original order and hierarchy of points	No	Parallel structure, numbering, headings

---

Aula 9

Same Research, Different Abstracts — From Summary to Genre Analysis

What Made You Decide?

The Genre Analysis Lens